Ancient Rome
Mini SGA
|
Topic |
Text References |
|
Punic Wars |
page. 172-173 |
|
From
Pompey to Caesar |
page
179-180 |
|
Ides of
March and From Republic to Empire, Antony and Cleopatra |
article |
|
Age of Augustus
– The Principate
|
page 196 –
197 |
|
Roman
Baths and Aqueducts |
page 203 |
|
Amphitheatres,
Gladiators & Circus |
page 205 -
206 |
Roman Baths & Aqueducts
Roman baths were
part of the day-to-day life in Ancient
Rome. Bath in Somerset, contains one of the best examples of a Roman bath
complex in Europe. There are two good examples
at Pompeii. Roman houses
had water supplied via lead pipes. However, these pipes were taxed according to
their size, so many houses had just a basic supply and
could not hope to rival a bath complex. Therefore for personal hygiene, people
went to the local baths. However, the local bath complex was also a gathering
point and served a very useful community and social function. Here people could
relax, keep clean and keep up with the latest news.
Taking a bath was
not a simple chore. There was not one bath to use in a large complex such as
the one at Bath. A visitor could use a cold bath (the frigidarium),
a warm bath (the tepidarium) and a hot bath
(the caldarium). A visitor would spend some of his time in each one
before leaving. A large complex would also contain an exercise area (the palaestra), a swimming pool and a gymnasium. One of
the public baths at Pompeii contains two tepidariums
and caldariums along with a plunge pool and a large
exercise area.
The building of a
bath complex required excellent engineering
skills. Baths required a way of heating up water. This was done by using a
furnace and the hypocaust system carried the heat around the complex.
Water had to be
constantly supplied. In Rome this was done using 640 kilometers of aqueducts -
a superb engineering feat. The baths themselves could be huge. A complex built
by the emperor Diocletian was the size of a football pitch. Those who built
them wanted to make a statement - so that many baths contained mosaics and
massive marble columns. The larger baths contained statues to the gods and
professionals were on hand to help take the strain out of having a bath.
Masseurs would massage visitors and then rub scented olive oil into their skin.
It was very cheap
to use a Roman bath. A visitor, after paying his entrance fee, would strip
naked and hand his clothes to an attendant. He could then do some exercising to
work up a sweat before moving into the tepidarium
which would prepare him for the caldarium which was more or less like a modern
sauna. The idea, as with a sauna, was for the sweat to get rid of the body's
dirt. After this a slave would rub olive oil into the visitor's skin and then
scrap it off with a strigil. The more luxurious
establishments would have professional masseurs to do this. After this, the
visitor would return to the tepidarium and then to frigidarium to cool down. Finally, he could use the main
pool for a swim or to generally socialise. Bathing
was very important to the Ancient
Romans as it served many functions.
The Ides
of March
Julius Caesar's bloody assassination on March 15, 44 B.C., forever
marked March 15, or the Ides of March, as a day of infamy. It has fascinated
scholars and writers ever since. For ancient Romans
living before that event, however, an ides was merely
one of several common calendar terms used to mark monthly lunar events. The
ides simply marked the appearance of the full moon. But the Ides of March assumed a whole
new identity after the events of 44 B.C. The phrase came to represent a
specific day of abrupt change that set off a ripple of repercussions throughout
Roman society and beyond.
On the Ides
of March, the senate was to meet in the Curia Pompeii, an annex of the
colonnaded Porticus adjacent to the stage of the
Theater of Pompeii, which had been built by Pompey (Pompeius)
just a decade or so before. Caesar was late. As Brutus and Cassius anxiously
waited for him to arrive, one of the senators confided that his prayers were
with them. "May your plan succeed," relates Plutarch, "but
whatever you do, make haste. Everyone is talking about it by now." But
there was nothing the conspirators could do except grasp their daggers and
prepare to use them on themselves, if need be. Porcia,
the daughter of Cato, whom Brutus had married within a year of her father's
death, had insisted that she be told of the plan. The day of the assassination,
her anxiety was so great that she became hysterical and fainted from
apprehension.
Suetonius
relates that a soothsayer had warned Caesar that he was in grave danger, which
would not pass until the Ides had ended. Entering the building, Caesar now
chided him that the day had arrived. "Yes," he replied, "but
they have not yet gone." As Caesar took his seat, the conspirators
gathered around him on the pretext of presenting a petition. One then took hold
of his purple toga and ripped it away from his neck. A dagger was thrust at
Caesar's throat but missed and only wounded him. Another assassin then drove a
dagger into his chest as he twisted away from the first assailant. Brutus
struck Caesar in the groin. Hemmed in, "Caesar kept turning," writes
Appian, "from one to another of them with furious cries like a wild
beast." When he saw that Brutus, too, had drawn his dagger, Plutarch
relates that Caesar covered his head with his toga and sank to the ground,
reproaching him in Greek, says Suetonius, with the words "You, too, my
child?"
Even after he
had fallen, the conspirators continued to strike, at
times cutting one another with their own daggers, until they, too, were covered
in blood. (Having recently sworn to defend the person of Caesar, which was
sacred and inviolate, the assassins must have paused at enormity of their deed;
only the second wound later was thought to have been fatal.) Slumped against
the pedestal of Pompey's statue, Caesar died, having been stabbed twenty-three
times. "The pedestal was drenched with blood," writes Plutarch,
"so that one might have thought that Pompey himself was presiding over
this act of vengeance against his enemy, who lay there at his feet struggling
convulsively under so many wounds."
If the
conspirators had killed in the name of Republican libertas,
it was the liberty of the Optimates for which
they acted. There was to be no popular support for the deed; nor, perhaps, was
what the conspirators had sought to preserve even the same. To Appian, at
least, "The Republic has been rotten for a long time. The city masses are
now thoroughly mixed with foreign blood, the freed slave has the same rights as
a citizen, and those who are still slaves look no different from their
masters." It was as if, for the conspirators, the death of the tyrant was
sufficient, with no thought being given to what would happen in consequence. It
all had been planned, relates Cicero, with the "courage of men and the
foresight of children." But the res publica
was not to be restored. The only outcome was what Caesar himself had predicted:
"It is more important for Rome," Suetonius quotes him as saying,
"than for myself that I should survive...should anything happen to me,
Rome will enjoy no peace." And so it was: civil war would rage for another
thirteen years.