|
Knowledge /
Understanding: MULTIPLE
CHOICE |
/23 |
|
Thinking / Inquiry: ESSAY |
/15 |
|
Communication / Application: SHORT ANSWER |
/12 |
|
TOTAL |
/ 50 |
CHW 3M1: World History to 16th
Century
Unit Test: Ancient
Egypt and Israel
PART D: ESSAY (Thinking/
Inquiry) 15 marks
Answer the following question in proper
argumentative essay format (5 paragraphs).
Make sure you have a clear introduction, thesis, 3 arguments &
evidence and conclusion.
1. The key features of Egyptian theology were
based around the tenets of religion.
Evaluate the influence of religion in Egyptian society and describe how
it was instrumental to the stability and longevity of Ancient Egypt by
examining any three of the following:
role of Pharaoh, yearly cycle of Nile, art, education, Ma’at, afterlife, nature’s influence, gods / deities and
the spirit world, social structure, mummification or the pyramids.
Reminder of Proper Essay Format
1st
Paragraph
- Introduction
- background
information - thesis -list 3
subtopics |
2nd
Paragraph
-introduce
subtopic 1 -state
evidence |
3rd
Paragraph
-introduce
subtopic 2 -state
evidence |
4th
Paragraph
-introduce
subtopic 3 -state
evidence |
5th
Paragraph
- Conclusion
- restate
thesis - restate 3
subtopics - positive
and moral lesson |
TEST ESSAY RUBRIC
|
Criteria |
Level 4 |
Level 3 |
Level 2 |
Level 1 |
|
THESIS |
Thesis is insightful, critical and clearly frames
subtopics |
Thesis is concise, argumentative and states subtopics
in order |
Thesis is vague; not all three subtopics relate to
argument |
Poor thesis; lack of framework or relation for
subtopics |
|
ARUGMENTS |
Demonstrates exceptional insight and analysis into
arguments |
Analysis clearly indicates importance and
significance of arguments |
Lack of analysis and more elaboration and connection
to thesis is needed |
Severe lack of analysis or insight |
|
EVIDENCE |
All evidence is exceptional, accurate and always
supports thesis |
Most evidence is effective and accurate and supports
thesis |
Some errors in accuracy or poorly chosen evidence |
Evidence is inaccurate and fails to support arguments |
|
STRUCTURE |
Essay uses structure in a natural and logical
progression of ideas |
Appropriate structure
(intro, thesis, 3 body paragraphs, conclusion) |
Some elements of structure are missing |
Structure is used incorrectly |
|
LANGUAGE |
Exceptional use of language and vocabulary which
enhances the arguments |
Sound use of language conventions |
Some spelling and grammatical errors |
Essay is incoherent and spelling / grammar are weak |