Great Debates in American History
Should the United States Pursue a Foreign Policy of Isolationism or
Interventionism?
Comprehension Questions
1. List the economic advantages of imperialism stated by Albert Beveridge.
2. Summarize the position of the Anti-Imperialist League regarding the actions of American military forces in the Philippines.
3. How does Beveridge respond to the argument that overseas colonies will be separated from mainland America?
4. What
political actions is the Anti-Imperialist League planning to take?
Critical Thinking
1. Making Comparisons: How are Beveridge’s idealistic arguments different from the Anti-Imperialist League’s idealistic arguments?
2. Recognizing Bias: Locate two examples of Beveridge’s bias in favour of the American system of government
3. Drawing
Conclusions: Which of the following
people would probably have disagreed with the arguments of the Anti-Imperialist
League in 1899? Why?
a) a citizen of the Philippines
b) a citizen of Cuba
c) a citizen of Great Britain
4. Testing Conclusions: Evaluate the arguments on both sides of the debate. Which side’s arguments are most effective and convincing? Use specific reasons and examples to support your positions.
5. Then and Now: Can the same arguments from the articles be applied to the debate on American foreign policy today? Why or why not?
Reflective
Writing Assignment
1. Based on the readings and the movie Why we Fight, how has America’s foreign policy developed and changed throughout history? In your opinion, what should America’s foreign policy be in today’s world: isolationism or interventionism? Explain and justify your response. (approximately 150 words).
GREAT DEBATES IN AMERICAN HISTORY: RUBRIC
|
Criteria |
Level 4 |
Level 3 |
Level 2 |
Level 1 |
|
Knowledge
and Understanding |
*all
questions are answered correctly and accurately with precise detail, examples
and specific references |
*most
questions are answered correctly with detail, examples and specific
references |
*some
questions are answered correctly and
accurately with some detail, examples and specific references |
*very
few questions are answered correctly with limited detail, examples and specific references |
|
Thinking /
Inquiry |
*exceptional
demonstration of critical thinking concerning the debate in American foreign
policy in reflective writing assignment *reasons
are supported with examples in a highly effective manner |
*concrete
critical thinking concerning the debate in American foreign policy in reflective
writing assignment |
*critical
thinking concerning the debate in American foreign policy in reflective writing
assignment is somewhat evident *there
is little attempt to support ideas with concrete examples |
*critical
thinking concerning the debate in American foreign policy in reflective writing
assignment is not evident |
|
Application |
*ideas
are original and sophisticated *Main
ideas / reasons are thought provoking,
original, and is developed in a sophisticated way |
*Ideas
are original and sophisticated ideas
are well developed and clearly
developed |
*The
idea are somewhat original but lack sophistication |
*the
ideas lack originality and sophistication and ideas do not always evident or
clearly developed |
|
Communication |
*Language
is sophisticated and highly effective *Excellent
development of ideas *Correct
spelling, grammar and paragraphing *Transitions
between sentences / paragraphs is skillfully handled |
*Language
is effective *Very
good development of ideas *Few
errors in spelling, grammar and paraphrasing *Transitions
between sentences / paragraphs is used correctly |
*Language
is appropriate *little
development of ideas *Some
errors in paragraphing, spelling and grammar *Transitions
between sentences / paragraphs is attempted |
*language
is misleading and or inappropriate *no
development of ideas *numerous
errors in spelling, grammar and paragraphing *many
errors in spelling & or grammar *Transitions
between sentences / paragraphs is used inconsistently, or absent |