|
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
Total |
|
Organization |
Audience cannot understand presentation
because there is no sequence of information. |
Audience has difficulty following
presentation because student jumps around. |
Student presents information in logical
sequence which audience can follow. |
Student presents information in logical,
interesting sequence which audience can follow. |
|
|
Subject
Knowledge |
Student demonstrates a limited
understanding of the concepts and facts |
Student demonstrates some understanding of
the concepts and facts |
Student demonstrates a good understanding
of the concepts and facts |
Student demonstrates a thorough
understanding of the concepts and facts |
|
|
Communication |
Student presents information in a style and
tone that is not appropriate to the audience |
Student presents information in a style and
tone appropriate to the audience |
Student presents information in a style and
tone consistent with the audience’s knowledge or understanding |
Student presents information in a style and
tone that effectively matches the audience’s knowledge or understanding |
|
|
Eye
Contact |
Student reads all of report with no eye
contact. |
Student occasionally uses eye contact, but
still reads most of report. |
Student maintains eye contact most of the
time but frequently returns to notes. |
Student maintains eye contact with
audience, seldom returning to notes. |
|
|
Elocution |
Student mumbles, incorrectly pronounces
terms, and speaks too quietly for students in the back of class to hear. |
Student's voice is low. Student incorrectly
pronounces terms. Audience members have difficulty hearing presentation. |
Student's voice is clear. Student
pronounces most words correctly. Most audience members can hear presentation. |
Student uses a clear voice and correct,
precise pronunciation of terms so that all audience members can hear
presentation. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Points: |
|
MINI-ESSAY RUBRIC NAME:
___________________
APPLICATION &
THINKING/INQUIRY
|
Criteria |
Level 1 |
Level 2 |
Level 3 |
Level 4 |
|
|
THESIS |
Poor thesis; lack of framework or relation
for subtopics |
Thesis is vague; not all subtopics relate to
argument |
Thesis is concise, argumentative and states
subtopics in order |
Thesis is insightful, critical and clearly
frames subtopics |
|
|
ARUGMENTS |
Severe lack of analysis or insight |
Lack of analysis and more elaboration and
connection to thesis is needed |
Analysis clearly indicates importance and
significance of arguments |
Demonstrates exceptional insight and
analysis into arguments |
|
|
EVIDENCE |
Evidence is inaccurate and fails to support
arguments |
Some errors in accuracy or poorly chosen
evidence |
Most evidence is effective and accurate and
supports thesis |
All evidence is exceptional, accurate and
always supports thesis |
|
|
STRUCTURE |
Structure is used incorrectly |
Some elements of structure are missing |
Appropriate structure (intro, thesis, body paragraphs,
conclusion) |
Essay uses structure in a natural and
logical progression of ideas |
|
|
LANGUAGE |
Essay is incoherent and spelling / grammar
are weak |
Some spelling and grammatical errors |
Sound use of language conventions |
Exceptional use of language and vocabulary
which enhances the arguments |
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Points: |
|
|
|