Markville
Secondary School
CHC 2D1
Gr. 10 Canadian History in the Twentieth
Century
Final Exam
Date: Thursday,
June 21, 2007
Time:
11:00 a.m. – 12:30 p.m. (1 ½
hours)
Teachers: Miss
Chong, Miss Mathura, Mr. Melnyk
Total Pages: 11 pages
Section: CHC 2D1 - ____
|
Knowledge / Understanding |
Part A. Identify and Importance (10 marks) Part B. Multiple Choice (40 marks) |
50 |
|
Thinking / Inquiry |
Part C. Primary Sources: documents, images and maps |
|
|
Application |
Part D. Timeline |
10 |
|
Communication |
Part E. Essay |
20 |
|
100 |
||
Part E. Essay (Communication) 20 marks
Choose ONE of the
following questions and answer in a formal five-paragraph argumentative essay.
1. Have
French-English relations deteriorated in the twentieth century? Refer to three of the following: Boer War, Conscription Crisis of 1917, Quiet
Revolution, October Crisis, Constitution Act 1982 and the issue of Quebec
Separatism.
2. Evaluate
how
3. Wilfrid Laurier once stated that “the twentieth century
would belong to
4. Historians have stated that “those that do not know their own history are doomed to repeat it”. What lessons have the Canadian government, politicians and Canadian people learned through past controversial decisions and actions? Refer to any three of the following: residential schools, conscription, interment, relief camps, immigration restrictions, policy of appeasement, October Crisis, cancellation of the Avro Arrow.
5. Has
Reminder of Proper Essay Format
1st
Paragraph
- Introduction
-
background information -
thesis -list
3 subtopics |
2nd
Paragraph
-introduce
subtopic 1 -state
evidence |
3rd
Paragraph
-introduce
subtopic 2 -state
evidence |
4th
Paragraph
-introduce
subtopic 3 -state
evidence |
5th
Paragraph
- Conclusion
-
restate thesis -
restate 3 subtopics -
positive and moral lesson |
ESSAY RUBRIC
|
Criteria |
Level 4 |
Level 3 |
Level 2 |
Level 1 |
|
THESIS |
Thesis is insightful,
critical and clearly frames subtopics |
Thesis is concise,
argumentative and states subtopics in order |
Thesis is vague; not
all three subtopics relate to argument |
Poor thesis; lack of
framework or relation for subtopics |
|
ARUGMENTS |
Demonstrates
exceptional insight and analysis into arguments |
Analysis clearly
indicates importance and significance of arguments |
Lack of analysis and
more elaboration and connection to thesis is needed |
Severe lack of analysis
or insight |
|
EVIDENCE |
All evidence is
exceptional, accurate and always supports
thesis |
Most evidence is
effective and accurate and supports thesis |
Some errors in accuracy
or poorly chosen evidence |
Evidence is inaccurate
and fails to support arguments |
|
STRUCTURE |
Essay uses structure in
a natural and logical progression of ideas |
Appropriate
structure (intro, thesis, 3 body
paragraphs, conclusion) |
Some elements of
structure are missing |
Structure is used
incorrectly |
|
LANGUAGE |
Exceptional use of
language and vocabulary which enhances the arguments |
Sound use of language
conventions |
Some spelling and
grammatical errors |
Essay is incoherent and
spelling / grammar are weak |