Introduction: The Overpopulation Debate

§         Two central debates concerning human pop’n issues

o       Is overpop’n a problem?

o       If yes, who is responsible?

§         1996: Canada’s pop’n exceeded 30 million

§         end of last ice age: entire earth probably supported less than 10 million ppl

§         1930: 2 billion; 1995: 6 billion; 2025: 8 billion?

§         We are adding 100 million people a year to the planet (more than pop’n of Germany)

§         Not uncommon to hear estimates of global pop’n of well over 12 billion

§         Demographers liken global pop’n growth to large cargo ships

o       One can stop engines, but it will be some time before one stops the boat

§         Many women of childbearing age: even if they all had 1 child, pop’n will still increase dramatically since newborns would be alieve at the same time as the parents

§         Major food crisis on horizon

§         60s, 70s: “green revolution” increased crop yields b/c of irrigation pesticides, fertilizer

o       less viable today b/c almost all prime arable land has been used and excessive use of pesticides caused more problems than it solved

§         promise of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) = politically and scientifically contentious

§         enough food is available now; malnutrition and undernourishment à inadequate distribution 

o       this may not be the case when our pop’n doubles to 12 billion

o       current trends show distribution of food continues to be uneven (overindulgence in some areas and malnutrition on others)

§         demographic transition that characterized European development involved decline of birth and death rates

§         China and India: more than 1 billion ppl à doubtful that any sort of transition can stem massive pop’n increases

o       Some argue that China’s one-child policy was necessary and should be an example to follow

§         “Pop’n bomb” idea popularized in 70s by Paul and Anne Ehrlich

o       massive increases in pop’n threatened not just the standard of living of people around the globe, but human life itself.

§         “Tragedy of the Commons” by Garret Hardin (neo-Malthusian literature):

o       we simply cannot afford to allow pop’n increases

o       to ensure our future collective survival, even the freedom to reproduce must be limited

§         some argue pop’n growth will level off w/ continued economic growth or with famine and disease (e.g. Germany and Russia)

§         others suggest that consumption patterns of the citizens in relatively affluent states are unsustainable

§         Environmental impacts of pop’n size, affluence (i.e. consumption), and technology are interrelated (so says a formula from the 1960s)

o       Northern states contribute more to global warming

o       Southern states contribute to rapid pop’n growth

§         Ethical question: should gov’ts impose birth control on their populations?

o       Chinese gov’t à once child policy successful but has downfalls (e.g. infanticide)

§         UN Conference on Population and Development (Cairo, 1994) produced a plan to prevent world pop’n from exceeding 7.2 billion over next 20 years

o       Up to individual governments to stem poverty and provide family planning possibilities

§         Two visible outcomes of pop’n explosion:

o       Urbanization

o       Demand for birth control policies in crowded states

 

Urbanization

§      One of the most pronounced effects of pop’n growth and movement = urbanization

§      City = primary indicator of “modernity” and progress

o       Bangkok: skyscrapers = proof of economic miracle or glittering face on detrimental effects of rapid development?

§      Big cities w/ high pop’n densities reduce unit costs of infrastructure (cheaper to supply essential serves such as water, electricity and education) to ppl if they live closer together)

o       Employment opportunities and image of better life attract migratory labour

o       Companies more likely to invest in cities b/c easily accessible labour pool and markets

o       High concentrated activities can be regulated by gov’t

§      Environmental question: is urbanization really a step into the right developmental direction?

o       Traffic congestion, waste disposal/sanitation, demands on natural resources

o       Increasingly, northern and southern analysts of sustainable development cast urbanization in a negative light à this view is tied to pop’n growth

§      Disastrous environmental effects = urbanization + poverty + poor services + lax regulations

o       Infrastructure is unable to meet city demands

o       Unequal access to infrastructure that is available

o       Lack of precautions against the environmental risks (natural and industrial)

§         Katmandu, Nepal; Mexico City, Mexico; Bhopal, India      

§         Only 2% of Bangkok is connected to sewers

 


GLOSSARY

Demographic transition theory: Argues that decline in the industrialized state’s birth rate is a direct consequence of social and economic development, and that with time other states will follow.

 

Neo-Malthusian: Argument that resources will be outstripped by population growth in the modern era; has led to calls for strict population control.

 

Infanticide: The deliberate killing of children.

 

Urbanization: The process of growth, often rapid, of cities.

 

Gross national product (GNP): The sum of all the goods and services produced by a state’s nationals, whether in that state or abroad.