Should Religious Beliefs be excluded from Consideration of Public Policy?

 

à Yes

     Justice Mary Saunders, Opinion in Chamberlaain v. Surrey School District #36

 

How is Started:

o       1995: Ministry of Education implemented the personal planning curriculum that included a family life component

o       GALE (Gay and Lesbian Educators) had developed a list of books that portray homosexual and bisexual persons to be part of the prescribed list. 

o       One teacher in the Surrey school board requested 3 books in the GALE list to be part of teaching kindergarten and grade 1

o       The 3 books were: Asha’s Mums, Belinda’s Bouquet, One dad, two dads, brown dad, blue dad

o       GALE list did not receive ministerial approval, but was widely distributed to teachers and librarians in British Columbia. 

o       Superintendent of School District declared that the three books were unnecessary for achieving the objectives of the school curriculum.

o       The community elected the school board to come up with the final verdict

v    Vote of 4-2, passed a resolution declining to approve the books.

 

Points to Consider:

q       Justice Mary Saunders of B.C Supreme Court pointed out that due to the British Columbia School Act all school should be run “strictly secular and non-sectarian principles.” (Independent of religious consideration)

q       The School Act incorporates parent participation in educational decisions, curriculum issues, and consideration of parental views on sensitive issues is wise.

·        All parties agree that the books required approval of the school board before a teacher could use them for educational purposes

·        Parents’ freedom of religion

·        Left for the Parents to deal with at Home

·        Tend to confuse children and may interfere with parental education on religious and moral matters.

q       Charter of Rights and Freedom states that it protects persons, not conduct, and thus that it protects homosexual persons, not homosexual conduct. 

q       Pg 595 in Egan v.Canada by Mr. Justice Cory states that, “..So long as those preferences do not infringe any laws, they should be tolerated.”

·        No relevance to school curriculum

·        Justice Saunders says the books/issue should be based on age appropriateness because they would cause confusion and conflict.

·        Her view on teaching of the subject of same-sex relationship allows a child to validate beliefs that the relationship would be morally wrong from their religious viewpoint. 

 

 

 

 

Parents Responses were:

Ø     Children would be confused at the challenge to their own faith and family values.

Ø     Contrary to one’s personal religious beliefs

Ø     Teach our children according to religious, the homosexual lifestyle is wrong

Ø     My and my wife would like to teach out children according to religious beliefs without having the school teach them something at an early age

Ø     Not to negate our rights as parents to teach out children

Ø     Contrary to the teaching of the bible

Ø     Do not want school to contradict their own teaching

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Glossary

 

Statutory: Enacted by statute; depending on statute for its authority; as, a statutory

                 provision.

 

Inculcate: To impress (something) upon the mind of another by frequent instruction or 

      repetition; instill: inculcating sound principles.

 

Sectarian: Of, relating to, or characteristic of a sect

 

Clergy: The body of people ordained for religious service.

 

Secular: Worldly rather than spiritual.

            Not specifically relating to religion or to a religious body

 

Pluralistic: An adherent of social or philosophical pluralism.

                Ecclesiastical. A person who holds two or more offices, especially two or

      more benefices, at the same time.

 

Affidavits: A written declaration made under oath before a notary public or other

      authorized officer.

 

Negate: To make ineffective or invalid; nullify.

 

Quashed: To set aside or annul, especially by judicial action.

 

Indoctrination: To instruct in a body of doctrine or principles.

                         To imbue with a partisan or ideological point of view: a generation of

   children who had been indoctrinated against the values of their parents.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Discussion Questions

 

1) Should it be allowed for public policy officials to make decisions that are motivated in part of religious beliefs?

2) Does the Charter of Rights and Freedoms require that moral beliefs that originate from religious belief be excluded from public debate?

3) In your opinion do you think that “secular” essentially means “non-religious”?

4) Public School Act states:

5) All public schools established under the provisions of this Act, shall be conducted upon strictly secular and non-sectarian principles…

6) What roles do you think religious convictions should play in the public square?

7) Do you believe that students in kindergarten and grade one should be introduced to same sex relationships?

8) If this issue was passed by a vote, what conflicts do you think would occur?

9) As you know teachers play a key role in our society, which places them in a direct position of trust and authority toward their students.  Do you believe that it is appropriate for teaches to teach their students about sensitive issues like this?

10)                    In current news now same sex marriages is now legal.  Will it be true that later on in the years that the main issues will directly relate to gay and lesbian issues?

11)                    On a scale of 1-10, 1 being the lowest and 10 being the highest, what rank do you fall in the interest of this category?

12)                    Now, are there anymore questions any one of you would like to bring up?